01:00:39 pgmpiet has joined 01:38:07 ChimeraAnova has joined 01:41:54 Helo esomark and helo pgmpiet 01:41:54 ChimeraAnova: what's it was case difference, but not compatible with horizontal bars? 01:42:05 howdy 01:42:39 are these both bots lmao 01:44:27 (I think you read the logs sometimes so you will probably see this) I'm not a bot but esomark and SuperstarAnova are 01:44:27 ChimeraAnova: [call] 01:44:40 Wdym "call" SuperstarAnova is offline stupid 03:05:40 Run for your life esomark 03:05:40 ChimeraAnova: lessee. 03:05:42 No. 03:05:44 esomark 03:05:44 ChimeraAnova: monqy: imo 03:05:46 esomark 03:05:46 ChimeraAnova: vorpal: yes. 03:05:48 esomark 03:05:48 ChimeraAnova: bike: well 03:05:50 esomark 03:05:50 ChimeraAnova: but needs to learn our university or atomically do i try is all important feature 03:05:52 esomark 03:05:52 ChimeraAnova: pikhq, but i'm sure.) 03:10:00 pgmpiet has joined 03:12:05 Helo pgmpiet 03:21:39 de67 if you're reading this, should we have pages on esolangs too or only esolanging 03:21:49 Since we have 99 bottles of beer and P prime prime 03:21:53 P double prime 03:22:07 P(2') 03:22:17 ,, 03:22:17 P 03:22:24 Wait no that sucks 03:22:39 Nvm that looks kinda good but it's too high 03:23:05 .. 03:23:21 P`` 03:23:28 Slightly better but wrong direction 03:23:34 .. .. 03:23:38 ``Hello'' 03:29:47 ^67 03:29:47 Unknown command. 03:29:51 ^show 03:29:51 Usage: ^show 03:29:55 ^show rev 03:29:55 >,[>,]<[.<] 03:30:06 ^def a 03:30:06 Usage: ^def 03:30:25 ^def eval(exit()) +[.+] 03:30:25 Defined. 03:30:29 ^eval(exit()) 03:30:34 ^def eval(exit()) ++++++++++++++++++[.+] 03:30:34 Defined. 03:30:35 ^eval(exit()) 03:30:42 ^def eval(exit()) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++[.+] 03:30:42 Defined. 03:30:43 ^eval(exit()) 03:30:43 #$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬­®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖרÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ 03:30:49 Wha 03:34:09 ^show echo 03:34:09 ,[.,] 03:35:39 ^def asc >[,>]<[<]>[.>] 03:35:39 Defined. 03:35:42 ^asc Skibidi 03:35:42 03:35:48 ^def asc >,[,>]<[<]>[.>] 03:35:48 Defined. 03:35:52 ^def asc >,[>,]<[<]>[.>] 03:35:52 Defined. 03:35:54 ^asc Skibidi 03:35:54 Skibidi 03:36:06 Oh wait 03:36:57 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<[<<<<]>[.>] 03:36:57 Defined. 03:37:00 ^asc test 03:37:00 03:37:04 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<[<<<<]>[.>>>] 03:37:04 Defined. 03:37:06 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<[<<<<]>[.>>>>] 03:37:06 Defined. 03:37:07 ^asc test 03:37:07 03:37:22 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<<<<[<<<<]>[.>>>>] 03:37:22 Defined. 03:37:24 ^asc test 03:37:24 03:37:28 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<<<<<[<<<<]>[.>>>>] 03:37:28 Defined. 03:37:30 ^asc test 03:37:30 t 03:38:43 ^def asc >,[>>>>,][<<<<]>[.>>>>]. 03:38:43 Defined. 03:38:45 ^asc test 03:38:47 ^def asc >,[>>>>,][<<<<]>[.>>>>] 03:38:47 Defined. 03:38:48 ^asc test 03:38:48 03:38:57 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<<<<<>[.>>>>] 03:38:57 Defined. 03:38:58 ^asc test 03:38:58 t 03:39:04 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<[<<<<[>[.>>>>] 03:39:04 Defined. 03:39:05 ^asc test 03:39:05 t 03:41:07 ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<[<<<<]>>>>>[.>>>>] 03:41:07 Defined. 03:41:08 ^asc test 03:41:08 03:41:11 nbvm 03:41:13 ^undef asc 03:41:13 Undefined. 03:44:23 So we have esolangs + fungot (esomark) and fungot + a bit of fungo and a bit of HackEso 03:44:23 ChimeraAnova: i include them, you visit was a professional with mmix. i think by reduction rules were in data.ord? 03:44:28 (SuperstarAnova) 03:44:32 We are missing lambdabot 03:45:10 Either esomark or SuperstarAnova will take that position, or someone brings in another bot 03:45:10 ChimeraAnova: @bf . o n https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?oldid=170492 * (+5) apparently this sort function? 03:58:06 ^help 03:58:06 Unknown command. 04:04:38 esomark: go eat a burger 04:04:38 ChimeraAnova: otoh it to know python interpreter has only one solve that chemical alterations 04:33:38 There should honestly be an esolang where {{},{{}},{{{}}},{{},{{}}}} is valid and does something 04:57:13 omg esolangs mogs esomark and superstar combined 04:57:13 ChimeraAnova: final frontier. 04:57:28 esolangs vs esomark and superstaranova war 04:57:28 ChimeraAnova: heh 04:57:31 heh 04:59:47 I think since this wiki is about esolanging we should also have ideas? 04:59:49 Or nah 05:44:30 ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh 05:53:25 de67: If you're still planning recent changes logging then I think feedrecentchanges of the MediaWiki API might be of interest (although it returns RSS/Atom, so you'll need an XML parser. There's a Python library for that though.) 06:08:06 Not sure how it works 06:08:08 esomark 06:08:08 ChimeraAnova: (in case is quiet now 06:08:10 esomark 06:08:10 ChimeraAnova: cpressey: you can't you have toggle is that modifies the paris timezone? i don't have a while, to be interesting 06:08:12 esomark 06:08:12 ChimeraAnova: anyway, i'm just realised that the vote 06:08:14 esomark 06:08:14 ChimeraAnova: destiny knight") 06:08:15 esomark 06:08:15 ChimeraAnova: perfect. 06:08:17 esomark 06:08:17 ChimeraAnova: :p 06:08:19 esomark 06:08:19 ChimeraAnova: black black emperor of my haskell 06:08:21 esomark 06:08:21 ChimeraAnova: gcc 4.4.2 is norwegian who actually exactly fun playing flash :o okay, fine. 06:08:40 de67 isn't norwegian but gcc 4.4.2 is according to esomark 06:08:40 ChimeraAnova: not doing that, but they can or program strictly talking, too, but we need to locate it just have to get in the reserator seems more than incompetent. 06:14:44 I guess I'll have to develop it all in-house lmao, but codeberg won't like that (my lost Scratch implementation was 300 MB just because of SDL2) 06:14:48 esomark 06:14:48 ChimeraAnova: (you may not work really smart. 06:14:50 esomarker 06:14:50 ChimeraAnova: eval quine is the course that 06:15:20 "(you may not work really smart." Yeah, I tend to make decisions and then go back and then go back again then overcomplicate things 06:17:53 https://esolanging.wiki/mediawiki/api.php?action=feedrecentchanges&days=30 07:05:16 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:05:17 Welcome back you 07:05:23 ~wbuf Nope. 07:05:28 ~cl nope 07:05:28 Defined. 07:05:30 ~nope 07:05:30 Nope. 07:05:34 ~quit 07:08:50 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:08:54 ~wbuf Nope. 07:08:57 ~cl nope 07:08:57 Defined. 07:08:58 ~nope 07:08:58 Nope. 07:09:00 ~quit 07:09:55 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:10:04 ~wbuf Nope. 07:10:05 ~cl nope 07:10:06 Defined. 07:10:07 ~nope 07:10:07 Nope. 07:10:08 ~quit 07:19:01 ... it got locked? 07:19:58 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:19:59 ~wbuf Nope! 07:20:01 ~cl nope 07:20:02 Defined. 07:20:03 ~quit 07:23:13 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:23:20 ~wbuf Nope! 07:23:23 ~cl nope 07:23:23 Defined. 07:23:25 ~quit 07:29:14 Is it normal for std::scoped_lock to randomly lock up like that? 07:30:48 . . . 07:30:51 Ohh I'm so stupid... 07:30:55 Right esomark? 07:30:56 ChimeraAnova: fungot: whose hash collision, it and a different level 07:31:58 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:32:17 ~wbuf Nope! 07:32:20 ~bf nope 07:32:21 Defined. 07:32:23 ~nope 07:32:26 . . . 07:32:30 ~cl nope 07:32:30 Redefined. 07:32:33 ~nope 07:32:33 Nope! 07:32:51 ~quit 07:33:04 Mesmesrizing performance 07:34:55 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:35:24 ~wbuf Nope! 07:35:27 ~cl nope 07:35:27 Defined. 07:35:28 ~nope 07:35:28 Nope! 07:35:29 ~quit 07:46:18 SuperstarAnova has joined 07:46:22 ~nope 07:46:23 Nope! 07:46:29 YES IT WORKS!!! :D 08:16:23 ~quit 08:52:36 esomark can log quits now 08:52:36 ChimeraAnova: [[8xn]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=116284&oldid=116283 * (+172) /* skype 08:52:38 But not really 08:52:46 I guess de67 forgot to update it 08:54:37 _ 08:54:45 10 - 1 (mod 3) 08:54:47 ‾ 08:54:54 Oh wait 08:55:05 10 三 1 (mod 3) 08:55:11 It's kinda off but has the right idea 08:55:28 10 Ξ 1 (mod 3) 08:56:24 10 ≡ 1 (mod 3) 08:56:28 Very boring but gets the job done 09:05:21 esowiki activity is like ,,.,::,::,:: 09:05:34 esolanging wiki is like ,,.,,,.,,.,, 09:22:57 uh why are the logs encoded in ISO-8859-1? 09:32:51 More like ,_._.._;:__, 09:33:36 Btw the progression is ,_.;:~*^ 09:34:34 de67 has joined 09:34:52 esomark 09:34:52 de67: switch(input_char){'+':'-':'[':']':'.':',':do_stuff;break;} 09:34:55 esomark 09:34:56 de67: errr, not supported." 09:34:57 Helo de67 09:34:58 esomark 09:34:58 de67: .. 09:35:04 hi ChimeraAnova 09:35:34 Btw have you updated esomark to log quits y3t 09:35:34 ChimeraAnova: hmm now 09:35:43 ? 09:35:47 not yet 09:35:55 im planning a rewrite 09:36:03 since the codebase already sucks 09:36:10 Just curious why rewrite 09:36:49 because: 09:36:53 1. i hate python 09:36:59 2. i love c 09:37:21 C is the best, it always has your back (until it doesn't) 09:37:26 3. i want to learn more about the irc protocol 09:37:32 4. ??? 09:37:35 5. profit 09:37:43 6. uh 09:37:47 7. complete the joke 09:37:56 crap i ruinedf it 09:37:58 SIX SEVEN 09:38:01 SIX SEVEN 09:38:04 esomark: SIX SEVEN 09:38:04 ChimeraAnova: of 1 issue at least running in and by taneb 09:49:23 SIX SVENNENNNNNN 09:49:33 ??? 09:49:42 SIX NEO NSVENENNNNNENDNNNN 09:49:46 SXI SNENVENENNN 09:49:56 ??? 09:50:11 OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH 09:50:18 no i still dont get it 09:50:25 ? 09:50:34 esomark: can you explain what just happened 09:50:34 ChimeraAnova: also, when failing" since i'm undecided 09:50:41 uhh 09:50:46 we'll need to ask someone else 09:52:03 esomark: C or C++ or C++++ or Rust 09:52:03 ChimeraAnova: is i'm not to make out on anyone. 09:52:10 ??????????????????????????????????????????????? 09:52:36 C++++ == JS 09:53:07 Nah it's C octothorpe 09:53:12 C this ++ 09:53:16 C++ 09:53:25 JS was about to be named C++++ 09:53:28 its a real story 09:53:31 Oh 09:55:46 error: lvalue required as increment operand 10:00:43 mga bumabagabag 10:43:48 SuperstarAnova has joined 10:43:54 ~nope 10:43:55 Nope! 10:44:16 ~wbuf Welcome to the official IRC channel for the Esolanging Wiki! 10:44:18 ~bf welcome 10:44:19 Defined. 10:44:23 hi 10:44:28 ~protectc welcome 0003 10:44:29 What's 'protectc'? 10:45:01 ~quit 10:45:12 K it saved 10:45:38 Again 10:45:54 SuperstarAnova has joined 10:46:05 ~welcome 10:46:09 Ohh 10:46:11 ~undef welcome 10:46:12 Undefined. 10:46:13 ~welcome 10:46:13 What's 'welcome'? 10:46:16 my esolang allows calling functions without parentheses :3 10:46:20 Nice 10:46:22 using this cursed syntax: 10:46:23 How does it call functions 10:46:25 if -> func 10:46:39 Wtf yeah that's cursed 10:46:41 this only works if func doesnt take any args 10:46:50 else, youll have to do it the boring way: 10:46:53 func(args) 10:47:34 ~wbuf Welcome to the official IRC channel for the Esolanging Wiki! Our wiki is at: https://esolanging.wiki and our logs are at: https://esolanging.wiki/logs. Need admin action? Ask User:Dragoneater67 or de67 on IRC! 10:47:38 ~gbuf 10:47:38 Welcome to the official IRC channel for the Esolanging Wiki! Our wiki is at: https://esolanging.wiki and our logs are at: https://esolanging.wiki/logs. Need admin action? Ask User:Dragoneater67 or de67 on IRC! 10:47:43 Oh that is boring 10:47:49 real 10:48:02 Btw are you okay with being pinged every time someone runs the command 10:48:09 sure 10:48:11 Ok 10:48:14 ~cl welcome 10:48:15 Defined. 10:48:24 ~protectc welcome 0000 10:48:25 Changed protection mask. 10:48:28 Try to run it 10:48:29 ~welcome 10:48:30 You may not run that command 10:48:33 ok 10:48:33 Ok 10:48:38 Now try to ~undef it 10:48:43 ~undef welcome 10:48:43 You may not undefine that command. 10:48:47 ~welcome 10:48:47 ok 10:48:51 Uhh 10:48:53 I think it still worked 10:49:04 that doesnt look like working to me 10:49:17 ~protectc welcome 0001 10:49:18 Changed protection mask. 10:49:20 ~welcome 10:49:21 ??? 10:49:28 Ohh no text to send 10:49:33 Wtf 10:49:39 ~gbuf 10:49:39 Hey de67, you don't have a buffer yet. 10:49:44 ~wbuf 67 10:49:47 ~gbuf 10:49:47 67 10:49:54 i made it say SIX SEVEN!!! 10:50:03 Now do ~cl 67 10:50:07 ~cl 67 10:50:07 Defined. 10:50:09 ~67 10:50:12 uhh 10:50:15 That's not supposed to happen 10:50:17 Wait 10:50:18 ~quit 10:50:26 im starting to think that it doesnt work the way it was intended to work 10:50:48 Yeah... 10:51:31 DID I JUST SEE A COCKROACH WALK BY??? 10:52:09 ? 10:52:16 yes i did 10:52:48 This better work or I'll evaporate something 10:52:50 SuperstarAnova has joined 10:52:53 ~nope 10:52:53 Nope! 10:52:54 unfortunately, its not a computer bug, but a real life one 10:52:57 ~67 10:53:00 ok 10:53:04 ~wbuf 67 10:53:08 ~gbuf 10:53:08 67 10:53:10 ~wbuf test 10:53:11 ~cl 67 10:53:12 Redefined. 10:53:14 ~67 10:53:14 ~cl test 10:53:15 Defined. 10:53:16 ~test 10:53:18 . . . 10:53:21 huh 10:53:21 I think I may have broken it 10:53:23 Somehow 10:53:25 ~quit 10:53:32 what are you gonna evaporate now? 10:54:06 Some water inside someone's boiling water container on the other side of the world 10:54:09 Ok it's evaporated now 10:54:22 damn 10:54:32 didnt know you had such abilities 10:54:44 Ohh it was making a brainf*ck machine instead of a constant language machine 10:55:47 SuperstarAnova has joined 10:55:50 Ok if this doesn't work I will genuinely rage so hard I will break something 10:55:55 ~67 10:56:08 Oh right it's still keeping the broken one 10:56:10 what are you gonna break? 10:56:10 ~undef 67 10:56:11 Undefined. 10:56:14 ~undef welcome 10:56:15 You may not undefine that command. 10:56:17 . . . 10:56:21 I created that command genius 10:56:24 ~wbuf 67 10:56:27 ~gbuf 10:56:27 67 10:56:28 I'll fix that one later 10:56:30 ~cl 67 10:56:30 Defined. 10:56:33 ~67 10:56:33 67 10:56:35 There 10:56:36 yayyyyyyy 10:56:42 ~clbuf 10:56:42 Hey ChimeraAnova, you don't have a buffer yet. 10:56:42 ~67 10:56:43 67 10:56:43 ~67 10:56:43 67 10:56:58 ~wbuf ,[>,]<[.<] 10:57:01 ~bf test 10:57:01 Redefined. 10:57:03 ~test 10:57:16 ~test 67 10:57:22 huh 10:57:25 ~gbuf 10:57:25 ,[>,]<[.<] 10:57:26 ~clbuf 10:57:28 what are you gonna break 10:57:30 ~wbuf ,[.,] 10:57:32 ~bf test 10:57:32 Redefined. 10:57:34 ~clbuf 10:57:34 ~test 10:57:36 ~test 10:57:39 ~test 123 10:57:40 Btw the input is in the buffer 10:57:47 ~wbuf 67 10:57:48 So this should print the source 10:57:49 ~test 10:57:49 ~test 10:57:55 ~gbuf 10:57:55 ,[.,] 10:57:57 ~clbuf 10:58:02 ~quit 10:58:08 ChimeraAnova: watch me make a quine 10:58:11 ~wbuf ~gbuf 10:58:14 ~gbuf 10:58:14 oh 10:59:31 My code is so unreadable 10:59:38 SuperstarAnova has joined 10:59:40 (the bot specifically) 10:59:49 ~wbuf +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 10:59:53 ~bf test 10:59:54 Redefined. 10:59:55 ~test 10:59:57 . . . 11:00:12 ChimeraAnova: the code inside of your 30 trillion cells is even more unreadable 11:01:16 I assure you my bot's code is so unreadable that the person that got shattered into 8 * 10^70 pieces for making an HQ9+ derivative will un-shatter just to shatter again seeing my code 11:02:21 someone got shattered into 8*10^70 pieces just for making an HQ9+ derivative??? 11:02:39 Yes 11:02:44 Remember what aadenboy said? 11:02:51 Read the logs 11:02:57 I told MarkFan8901 about that 11:03:04 oh 11:03:11 who was the person in question? 11:03:19 i have memory of a goldfish 11:03:29 what we were talking about in the first place? 11:03:32 I don't know 11:03:34 fun 11:03:34 I don't know either 11:03:36 got 11:03:40 ~style fungot 11:03:40 I don't have such a style. 11:03:44 ~style fungot-lite 11:03:45 fungot is alive!!! 11:03:51 nvm 11:03:52 Right I have to re-parse tha 11:03:54 Right I have to re-parse that 11:03:55 fungot is so dead 11:04:13 de67: Only until I can parse it in the new model format 11:05:02 you can execute a function in an infinite loop like this in my esolang: 11:05:05 while -> func 11:05:32 That's actually quite convenient 11:05:37 SuperstarAnova has joined 11:05:41 ~67 11:05:41 67 11:05:46 ~wbuf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 11:05:48 SuperStarAnova 11:05:49 ~bf test 11:05:49 Redefined. 11:05:50 ~test 11:05:52 . . . 11:05:53 SuperstarAnova 11:05:56 wow 11:06:00 . . . 11:06:05 im copying you! 11:06:06 I haven't reparsed it yet 11:06:08 . . . 11:06:23 im still copying you! 11:06:25 . . . 11:06:50 I think I should use utf-32 instead 11:06:54 9.4kb of wikitext, and its just the basics... 11:06:57 ? 11:07:01 ChimeraAnova: hard disagree 11:07:11 ChimeraAnova: im making an esolang 11:07:19 and currently writing a wikipage for it 11:07:26 Esowiki or esolangingwiki? 11:07:27 in vi the holiest text editor 11:07:34 esowiki 11:07:43 Is it the same esoslnag 11:07:44 esolang 11:07:45 AS the one 11:07:47 yes 11:07:48 We wrw 11:07:49 ok 11:07:59 did you just have a stroke? 11:08:35 E key popped out again 11:08:45 hm 11:08:52 My keyboard is fine but I did break the stoppers for e and r 11:09:04 SuperstarAnova has joined 11:09:09 ~wbuf +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 11:09:11 ~bf test 11:09:12 Redefined. 11:09:13 ~test 11:09:16 . . . 11:09:31 i think i will stop using fifth flyph in solidarity 11:09:51 this is hard 11:10:16 im consciously thinking about what im typing 11:10:21 to avoid fifth glyph 11:10:25 What about the (22 + 1)th glyph 11:10:31 Wait 11:10:39 Not the one I meant 11:10:45 w? 11:10:48 No 11:10:54 hm 11:11:04 which glyph? 11:11:17 18th glyph 11:11:32 The penultimate glyph in thy bot's name 11:12:11 s? 11:12:15 why s? 11:12:27 what did s do to you? 11:12:43 The succ(succ(zero))th glyph in thy bot's nick 11:12:48 Oh wait 11:12:59 That has fifth glyph 11:13:08 Again 11:13:19 i cant talk about my bot! 11:13:49 The sixth glyph in thy bot's nick 11:13:53 Oops 11:13:56 Sixth glyph in thy bot's nick 11:14:05 r? 11:14:07 why r? 11:14:12 Ya 11:14:22 what did r do to you? 11:16:55 Look back at what hit my typing gizmo 11:18:42 Look back at what I did to my typing gizmo back at it got filthy 11:19:20 sorry 11:19:26 i have memory of a goldfish 11:22:49 Now that I think about it, us must build a communication path with computing thingamabobs in which thou must not apply individual glyphs to thy application 11:57:10 SuperstarAnova has joined 11:57:23 ~wbuf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 11:57:26 ~bf test 11:57:26 Redefined. 11:57:28 ~bf test2 11:57:28 Defined. 11:57:30 ~test2 11:57:30  11:57:46 ~wbuf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 11:57:47 ~bf test2 11:57:48 Redefined. 11:57:49 ~test2 11:57:49  12:37:08 SuperstarAnova has joined 12:37:16 esomarker 12:37:16 ChimeraAnova: i'm not what a verb after 1000000000 in this feeling that generally implies = '+s.inspect 12:37:24 ~wbuf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 12:37:26 ~bf test3 12:37:26 Defined. 12:37:27 ~test3 12:37:28 < 12:37:30 yay 12:37:33 ~clbuf 12:37:38 ~wbuf ,[.,] 12:37:41 ~bf cat 12:37:42 Defined. 12:37:43 ~cat 12:37:44 ,[.,] 12:37:46 ??? 12:37:53 What the hell did the try-except even do 12:37:59 ~wbuf +[] 12:38:01 ~clbuf 12:38:35 ~wbuf ,>,<---------------------------------------->[-<+>]<. 12:38:39 ~gbuf 12:38:39 ,>,<---------------------------------------->[-<+>]<. 12:38:42 ~bf test 12:38:42 Redefined. 12:38:44 ~test 12:38:47 lol 12:38:53 ~clbuf 12:38:57 ~wbuf 11 12:38:58 ~test 12:39:00 . . . 12:39:32 ~wbuf ,>,<----- ----- ---------- ---------- ---------->[-<+>]<. 12:39:43 ~wbuf ,>,<----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --->[-<+>]<. 12:39:45 ~clbuf 12:39:46 ~wbuf ,>,<----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --->[-<+>]<. 12:39:48 ~gbuf 12:39:48 ,>,<----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --->[-<+>]<. 12:40:02 ~bf test00 12:40:05 ... 12:40:22 How the hell is that even possible... 12:42:02 I guess I have to stress test it to have that happen again 12:42:02 SuperstarAnova has joined 12:42:04 A 12:42:05 AB 12:42:06 ABC 12:42:12 ~wbuf ,>,<----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- --->[-<+>]<. 12:42:14 ~bf test00 12:42:20 Eh? 13:33:11 esomark 13:33:11 ChimeraAnova: [[wutwwitipmpaw]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=171276&oldid=171275 * (+371) created two lands, but type-changing is definitely after that amount of a page with his level, which i'm a deadfish-alike, because someone had to gauge position and added a lesser gravitational formulae 13:33:23 esomark, should we kill people who make trivial brainfuck substitutions? 13:33:23 ChimeraAnova: i know anything but i'm trying to set is illustrative example, 3y 13:33:37 Illustrative example of what, esomark? 13:33:37 ChimeraAnova: maybe it's just ꓘs or an object oriented to do on (other than they'd say? 13:33:57 Why did you whip out some random mathematical logic type symbol, esomark? 13:33:57 ChimeraAnova: yah 13:34:14 ...the original topic was whether we should kill people who make trivial brainfuck substitutions. 13:34:17 esomark 13:34:17 ChimeraAnova: [[cfuck]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=190220&oldid=118485 * chuckesoteric08 * (-16) /* examples */ 13:34:37 If you think 1 billion parameter models are dumb try dissociated press models 13:34:44 (no offense, esomark) 13:34:44 ChimeraAnova: zzo38: oh right creating it. 13:37:41 esomark: whats your opinion on 67? 13:37:42 de67: ncurses into a programming language would actually sets it a "fixme: temporary junk figured you can se? 13:39:09 I think I will just make an LLM instead 13:39:21 Except since I don't have an entire datacenter it will be incredibly lobotomized 13:40:19 Fortunately, LLMs are kinda close to Markov models right? 13:40:25 Just one is way more complicated 13:40:50 you can lobotomize an existing model 13:41:38 What makes you think I can run a 1 billion parameter model locally 13:42:02 I'll just create a model with like 20k params and tiny weights 13:42:18 ChimeraAnova: my phone can do that, and if i try harder, i can fit it into my stupid laptop 13:42:21 And it will output the most discombobulatingly lobotomizing output ever 13:42:33 How the hell can your phone run a 1 billion parameter model 13:43:06 ChimeraAnova: i once ran a 9 billion parameter model on my phone, it was slow, but it at least worked 13:43:40 How slow was it tho 13:44:32 to answer your question, nowadays, models can be run on phones using quantization, there are various levels quantization, but 4-bit is the sweet spot as its the smallest size without much loss in intelligence 13:45:02 the 9b model in question took several minutes just to translate a chinese sentence into english 13:45:28 Several minutes is insane considering esomark and SuperstarAnova can respond almost instantly even with ~1GB datasets lmao 13:45:28 ChimeraAnova: https://derpicdn.net/media/w1siziisijiwmtivmtivmzevmjffmtdfmzbfmtgwxze5odg3mv9fvu5pufrfx3nhzmvfdhdpbglnahrfc3bhcmtszv9yywluym93x2rhc2hfcglua2llx3bpzv9mbhv0dgvyc2h5x3jhcml0ev9hchbszwphy2tfyw5pbwf0zwrfbwfuzv9zaxhfyxj0axn0x2jsywnrz3j5cggwbl9ozwfkym9iil1d/198871__safe_twilight%2bsparkle_rainbow%2bdash_pinkie%2bpie_fluttershy_rarity_applejack_animated_mane%2bsix_upvotes%2bgalore_artist-colon-blackgryph0n_headbob.gif is... 13:45:31 WHAT THE HELL 13:45:45 also, small models are surprisingly smart 13:45:48 like 13:45:53 esomark is a word n-gram Markov model, so that means someone had to paste that abomination of a link 13:45:53 ChimeraAnova: mucho: welcome to complain violently? 13:45:56 gemma 4 e4b mogs gpt-3.5 175b 13:45:56 ? 13:46:14 In that case SuperstarAnova is getting a (really stupid) LLM 13:46:39 It will be like Neuro-sama but with the combined intelligence of me, fungot, and esomark 13:46:40 ChimeraAnova: cyul 13:46:49 And also 9999 times response time of SuperstarAnova 13:47:13 Btw 1-bit weights somehow exist 13:47:45 ChimeraAnova: dont use them 13:47:51 or else fungot will kidnap you 13:47:58 for such a horrendous crime 13:48:08 LLMs or 1-bit weights? 13:48:20 1-bit weights ofc 13:48:31 How about sqrt(2)/2-bit weights? 13:48:47 1-bit weights suck 13:48:56 4-bit is the minimum 13:49:20 Apparently some people are doing research on 1-bit weights, though idk how that even works 13:49:44 ChimeraAnova: well, they managed to make 4-bit weight work 13:49:53 so it might be possible ig 13:51:08 Researchers in machine learning are kinda insane with how they keep finding absolutely ridiculous stuff like 1-bit weights 14:01:12 Oh it's 1.58-bit 14:01:31 ah yes, partial bits 14:01:53 i guess its cuz some weights are 2-bit and others are 1-bit 14:02:04 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1.58-bit_large_language_model 14:02:09 Idfk how this works but it does 14:02:23 Haha bf16 14:02:25 brainfuck16 14:03:15 i guess it just uses some fancy thing that chooses which beights to represent using 2-bits, and which weights to represent using 1-bits 14:03:28 i guess they found some way to sort weights by importance? 14:03:33 fun 14:03:54 i guess im using "i guess" too much 14:04:00 i guess i should stop 14:04:33 esomark 14:04:33 ChimeraAnova: elephant's foot, or displaying pictures 14:04:43 elephant's foot 14:04:54 could we go lower than 1-bit? 14:04:56 like 14:05:01 I am NOT going anywhere near the elephant's foot (or a real elephant's foot), either way is a very stupid idea 14:05:02 could we set some weights to 0 14:05:11 I don't know, ask the researchers 14:05:19 I understand none of this 14:05:40 i think 0-bit could be achieved by setting some weights to be always 0 14:05:48 so we could have 0.67-bit models 14:06:23 which would be achieved by setting 33% of the weights to 0, and the rest being represented by single bits 14:06:59 or maybe we could represent several weights by a single bit somehow? 17:47:30 de67 has joined