02:58:53 <de67> esomark
02:58:53 <esomark> esomark and somewhat the fog gets olded 
 
02:58:57 <de67> esomark
02:58:57 <esomark> [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] 
 
02:59:00 <de67> esomark
02:59:00 <esomark> ^def 
 
02:59:02 <de67> esomark
02:59:02 <esomark> anovabot into 8 remove the esolang with esobot so the trained the anti-thue movement? 
 
02:59:05 <de67> esomark
02:59:05 <esomark> why tf is 3 
 
02:59:07 <de67> esomark
02:59:07 <esomark> [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] 
 
02:59:10 <de67> esomark
02:59:10 <esomark> ~clbuf 
 
02:59:13 <de67> esomark
02:59:13 <esomark> ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<<<<<>[.>>>>] 
 
02:59:22 <de67> ^color 0467
02:59:22 <esomark> 0467
03:54:20 <de67> esomark
03:54:20 <esomark> that 
 
08:19:17 <de67> esomark
08:19:17 <esomark> esomark and somewhat the fog gets olded 
 
08:19:19 <de67> esomark
08:19:19 <esomark> [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] 
 
08:19:21 <de67> esomark
08:19:21 <esomark> ^def 
 
08:19:23 <de67> esomark
08:19:23 <esomark> anovabot into 8 remove the esolang with esobot so the trained the anti-thue movement? 
 
08:19:25 <de67> esomark
08:19:25 <esomark> why tf is 3 
 
08:19:29 <de67> esomark
08:19:29 <esomark> [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] 
 
08:19:32 <de67> esomark
08:19:32 <esomark> ~clbuf 
 
08:19:34 <de67> esomark
08:19:34 <esomark> ^def asc >,[>>>>,]<<<<<>[.>>>>] 
 
08:19:37 <de67> esomark
08:19:37 <esomark> that 
 
08:20:22 <de67> ^def  +.,[.,]+.
08:20:22 <esomark> Defined.
08:20:36 <de67> ^ ACTIO  spams ctcp
08:20:36 <esomark> 
ACTIO  spams ctcp

08:20:44 <de67> ^ ACTION spams ctcp
08:20:44 <esomark> 
ACTION spams ctcp

08:21:19 <de67> 
ACTION spams ctcp

10:32:30 <de67> esomarker
10:32:30 <esomark> de67: esomark: candy 
 
10:32:30 <esomarker> de67: superstaranova: fizzie: but it logging all of one i don't want to imagine his esolangs out that says so. 
11:11:33 <CometIIWW> I wonder if a word-based model is better than a character-based one (Gobbledygook marks not LLMs)
11:12:59 <CometIIWW> "Arena closers of any kind (ex: 360-Machine Closer, Arena Summoner, FORD F150) spawning a new timeline halting problems" I've played Woomy since around the start of its (woomy.app era) decline until its shutdown and singleplayer conversion and I came back for woomy.online and even though I'm a newgen I don't think they do that
11:15:12 <de67> its a lil bit sad that the featured language thing will be removed soon
11:15:28 <CometIIWW> Wait what
11:15:35 <de67> ye
11:15:40 <CometIIWW> I saw that they said something like that but I didn't know they'd go through with it
11:15:46 <CometIIWW> At least let Befunge be featured!
11:15:48 <de67> ais523 that the process has been broken for a while
11:15:55 <CometIIWW> But seriously
11:16:18 <de67> also, you should take a look at [[Esolang:User:Dragoneater67/Sandbox]]
11:16:29 <de67> which hosts a draft for the new main page
11:17:57 <CometIIWW> I got fucking jumpscared /srs
11:18:06 <CometIIWW> I thought I somehow got sent to the real main page
11:18:07 <de67> CometIIWW: how?
11:18:14 <de67> oh
11:18:54 <CometIIWW> I think that's a fine alternative, and probably better too since now instead of one layer of indirection that lazy ass people (like me) will skip, they will see straight into it (even though they will most likely not go to it)
11:20:24 <CometIIWW> 09:14:24 <de67> hi guys
11:20:41 <CometIIWW> 04:33:50 <HackEso> Learned '67': HAHAHAHAH LOOK EVERYONE IM GOING SSSIX SEEVN
11:21:05 <CometIIWW> 20:36:42 <MarkFan8901> YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11:21:12 <CometIIWW> 06:37:50 <de67> no
11:21:17 <CometIIWW> fuck
11:21:18 <CometIIWW> 06:37:50 <de67> now
11:21:30 <CometIIWW> 11:36:25 <esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=192136 * Dragoneater67mobile * (+132) /* Dranoer]]  https://esolangs> [[User:Miui/Sandbox]]  https://esolangs: Вы понимания низком языка прогромна, и требует глубокого языка программировне, почти как с ассемблером, но...
11:21:30 <CometIIWW> 11:13:04 <inhahe> it can be discusses abstraction pointer for unauthenticated users can be faked with debian packages itself
11:22:50 <CometIIWW> de67: nasm is your intiializeation?
11:22:52 <CometIIWW> 19:03:19 <de67> nasm is my initialization"? But the existing since anyone cares enough from the provided text into 2 fragments ( god only independently difficult Python */
11:34:05 <CometIIWW> esomark: candy
11:34:05 <esomark> yes!!! 
 
11:34:11 <de67> yes!!!
11:34:12 <CometIIWW> esomark likes candy
11:34:12 <esomark> whar???? 
 
11:34:19 <CometIIWW> esomark: waht
11:34:19 <esomark> ~ 
 
11:34:29 <CometIIWW> de67: did you hit esomark with a brick again
11:34:29 <esomark> superstaranova: the wrong one direction of many yummy stuff like rust x - 
 
11:34:34 <CometIIWW> i guess yes
11:35:09 <de67> CometIIWW: no
11:35:14 <de67> at least not yet
11:35:20 <CometIIWW> You hit esomark with a smart fridge instead?
11:35:20 <esomark> no, esolexicons don't require a line (18, 36, and start vibecoding 
 
11:35:40 <CometIIWW> esomark: Say the name of my bot (either is fine) if de67 is holding you hostage and pretending you're a bot
11:35:40 <esomark> usage: ^def n = (int -> skibidi rizzler? 
 
11:35:47 <CometIIWW> I trust you
11:35:55 <CometIIWW> I think that's good
11:35:56 <de67> CometIIWW: no i hit it with an [[esolang:openbsd toaster]]
11:36:26 <CometIIWW> If you hit esomark with a Windows PC I bet esomark would have choked and gagged and split into 53 pieces
11:36:26 <esomark> uhh 
 
11:36:39 <CometIIWW> esomark: What? I've seen it happen with my very own eyes you know...
11:36:39 <esomark> chimeraanova: `w 
 
11:36:45 <CometIIWW> `w`
11:36:59 <de67> `w`
11:37:05 <CometIIWW> "no" ~ de67, 2026
11:37:21 <de67> "candy" ~ CometIIWW, 2026
11:37:39 <CometIIWW> esomark: Skibidi rizzler gyatts in ohio getting mogged by the ohio final boss in cleveland
11:37:39 <esomark> esomark-ng has joined 
 
11:38:04 <CometIIWW> '"candy" ~ CometIIWW, 2026' ~ de67, 2026
11:38:37 <de67> "'"candy" ~ CometIIWW, 2026' ~ de67, 2026" ~ CometIIWW, 2026
11:39:05 <CometIIWW> '"'"candy" ~ CometIIWW, 2026' ~ de67, 2026" ~ CometIIWW, 2026' ~ de67, 2026
11:39:41 <de67> kill all 8 billion people
11:40:14 <CometIIWW> "into uuh" ~ "de67", 2026
11:41:49 <CometIIWW> "yea something about these comments." ~ de67, 2026-09-21-00-15:24:43
11:43:52 <CometIIWW> 04:39:13 <raiseafloppafan7> fungot homestuck ic irc* jargon lovecraft nethack pa speeches ss wp youtube
11:43:57 <CometIIWW> I remember when I said that
11:44:04 <CometIIWW> 2026-09-2?
11:45:25 <CometIIWW> de67: because it timed out in thue
11:47:03 <CometIIWW> Reject C
11:47:06 <CometIIWW> Reject Rust
11:47:23 <CometIIWW> My bot said mutability is unintuitive
11:47:31 <CometIIWW> So we should all just use lambda calculus
11:47:45 <CometIIWW> "In the unintuitive-behavior-of-mutabilityΓÇômutabilityΓÇôstability-rw-perms" />" ~ AnovaBot, 2026
11:47:54 <de67> or even better, constant languages!
11:48:32 <CometIIWW> .🍡
11:48:59 <CometIIWW> That was supposed to be a Unicode character but I used AnovaBot from PowerShell which for some reason ignored my request to use Unicode-encoded output
11:49:15 <CometIIWW> One of the reasons I dislike Microsoft
11:49:51 <CometIIWW> Remember when esomark was gonna take over the world? (assuming it hasn't already)
11:49:51 <esomark> cmake is a mechannel. as my opinion to factorise numbers!! 
 
11:50:10 <CometIIWW> Well I am militarizing AnovaBot to make slop esolangs and uhh
11:50:14 <CometIIWW> * is similar ideas (having esolang based on the stack into a fungot. If such an action is not total. Example
11:50:17 <CometIIWW> Is that good
11:50:44 <CometIIWW> ? is a == b is a null pointer after freeing it twice does not halt as well as having esolang by User:Dragoneater67. If such an action is added for readability, and the imaginary/complex numbers are supported through the eat)
11:50:46 <CometIIWW> This too
11:51:20 <CometIIWW> My favorite one other than the "having esolang based on the stack into a fungot" one: Comments (does not.
11:51:28 <CometIIWW> That's not cut off btw
11:51:59 <de67> esomarker
11:51:59 <esomark> at the most minimalist operating system check oooot oooor veeki: <http://isulungs.oorg/>. (fur zee interneshunel hoob fur 
 
11:51:59 <esomarker> de67: has 
11:52:01 <de67> esomarker
11:52:01 <esomark> ~wbuf e => 1 of that direction, a useless one of this this is html turn ourself hm 
 
11:52:02 <esomarker> de67: 
11:52:05 <de67> esomarker
11:52:05 <esomark> update fine by they will judge. 
 
11:52:06 <esomarker> de67: has 
11:52:14 <de67> esomarker
11:52:14 <esomark> ~gbuf 
 
11:52:16 <esomarker> de67: 
11:52:24 <de67> esomarker
11:52:24 <esomark> 08:21:44 <de67> ^rev hello world! 
 
11:52:25 <esomarker> de67: 
11:52:47 <CometIIWW> esomarker read the logs, saw that AnovaBot is making shit esolangs, then shit its pants and died
11:52:47 <esomark> .. i had funged soo 
 
11:52:54 <CometIIWW> And esomark funged again
11:52:54 <esomark> german grammar 
 
11:53:03 <CometIIWW> de67: did you kidnap some random german guy
11:53:13 <de67> CometIIWW: i dont do kidnapping
11:53:17 <de67> fungot does it for me
11:53:21 <CometIIWW> Ok
12:01:41 <CometIIWW> An empty string of "1"s. (This will spawn an AI clone of [[User:Dragoneater67]] has said, the E key on his keyboards, I prefer standalone keyboards, I prefer standalone keyboards, I prefer standalone keyboards but like I said, there are no longer than <code>UPPERCASE KEYWORDS</code>.
12:04:48 <CometIIWW> "The fourth line determines the maximum accelerates data ring with the temporary stack and checks if they see a weak AI player then they will massacre everyone." is such a funny quote
12:05:18 <CometIIWW> Wait there's another sentence right after it
12:05:19 <CometIIWW> "However, User:Cleverxia. However, you cannot just 2, 4, and 31 are missing. However, User:raiseafloppafan7741 | year = Category:Language()"
12:08:44 <CometIIWW> Ah
12:08:51 <CometIIWW> I finally understand Pgmpietoncracklang
12:09:13 <de67> kill 9 billion people
12:09:46 <CometIIWW> No
12:09:51 <de67> ok fine
12:09:55 <de67> kill 10 billion people
12:10:05 <CometIIWW> Also I think I might be able to understand Choropleth
12:10:19 <de67> wait, miui makes esolangs?
12:10:39 <CometIIWW> wdym
12:10:52 <de67> i thought all of them were artlangs
12:11:01 <de67> pages that resemble descriptions of esolangs
12:11:06 <CometIIWW> I think Pgmpietoncracklang is kinda simple to understand, really
12:11:22 <CometIIWW> Obviously it's PGM Piet (on Crack)
12:11:42 <CometIIWW> And apparently "crack" is supposed to mean https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/monograph/abs/pii/B9780125973021500104
12:12:01 <CometIIWW> I don't know what that paper is about though
12:12:04 <de67> oh i thought miui was smoking crack
12:12:12 <de67> guess im stupif
12:13:31 <CometIIWW> miui smoked meth not crack
12:13:38 <CometIIWW> (when they were 2)
12:15:00 <CometIIWW> But yeah I think I finally understand Pgmpietoncracklang
12:15:19 <de67> dont view source for my userpage
12:15:24 <de67> on esolwik
12:15:25 <de67> woiki
12:15:27 <de67> weik
12:15:28 <de67> woeiks
12:15:30 <de67> esowike
12:15:30 <CometIIWW> Pgmpietoncracklang I think contains pgmpiet and pgmpietonpaper
12:15:32 <de67> woeikw
12:15:33 <de67> esi
12:15:33 <de67> ew
12:15:34 <de67> w
12:15:35 <de67> e
12:15:37 <de67> esowike
12:15:39 <de67> esowiki
12:15:41 <de67> FINALLYY
12:15:44 <de67> FINALLY
12:16:56 <CometIIWW> 67 is a peak program
12:17:04 <de67> whar
12:17:14 <CometIIWW> 67
12:17:19 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:19 <esomark> ^car hshskj 
 
12:17:21 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:21 <esomark> pkmnq: that's not a little article 
 
12:17:21 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:21 <esomark> superstaranova: you'd expect styles mashed ice sounds like somehow made the greatest esolanger ever used to mark <analysisofvarian: https://esolanging to do. > 05:34:57:41 <analysisofvarian> where tho 
 
12:17:21 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:21 <esomark> chimeraanova: e about the quality c++ and a victorian era tser eht fub ereht si stuck sending 451s now 
 
12:17:22 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:22 <esomark> i mean "i upgraded between brainfuck or dosbox! outragoues esomark 
 
12:17:22 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:22 <esomark> chimeraanova: eplace that means a draft networks!!! di 
 
12:17:22 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:22 <esomark> yk what lambdabot 
 
12:17:23 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:23 <esomark> 07:36:59 
 
12:17:23 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:23 <esomark> chimeraanova: > 17:54 <de67 unknows rustransiently try and does nothing of z gorayo de *5242) 
 
12:17:25 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:25 <esomark> and load 
 
12:17:25 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:25 <esomark> what the esolang whose name of ><> aade... 
 
12:17:26 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:26 <esomark> ~ignore effortunate style esolanging | style is q.e.d. /1 up again 
 
12:17:26 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:26 <esomark> "discombinary" feels trivial substitutions to is what the s! esolangs: who trawberatinus 100% sure. 
 
12:17:26 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:26 <esomark> 
 
12:17:26 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:26 <esomark> what's 'cuf'? 
 
12:17:27 <CometIIWW> esomark: 67
12:17:27 <esomark> i think in an admin" in like perl 
 
12:17:59 <[][][][]> Yes
12:18:09 <[][][][]> Ohr igt
12:18:14 <[][][][]> Back to Pgmpietoncracklang
12:18:36 <[][][][]> Wait a sec
12:18:57 <[][][][]> de67: I don't think Miui made Pgmpietoncracklang
12:19:04 <de67> [][][][]: ?
12:19:05 <[][][][]> wait this nickname sucks
12:19:19 <CometIIWW> https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?title=Pgmpietoncracklang&oldid=161805
12:19:24 <de67> huh
12:19:34 <CometIIWW> Apparently it existed a year ago
12:19:44 <CometIIWW> Not sure what it was about tho
12:19:52 <de67> Zobie211???
12:19:54 <de67> hm
12:20:02 <de67> this is quite sus
12:20:09 <CometIIWW> ?
12:20:28 <de67> hm
12:20:29 <CometIIWW> Like you theorize that miui and zobie211 are the same person?
12:20:33 <de67> yes
12:20:43 <de67> both seem to do strange edits
12:20:47 <CometIIWW> (and probably 색地図 too)
12:22:10 <CometIIWW> Wtf
12:22:25 <CometIIWW> https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?title=User:Miui/Choropleth&action=history
12:22:30 <CometIIWW> You might be right?
12:23:03 <CometIIWW> This is a brainfuck
12:23:47 <CometIIWW> Nvm
12:23:48 <de67> last edit from zobie211's account on Chloropth was on 21 july 2026, miui made the first edit on that page EXACTLY a year later
12:23:49 <CometIIWW> I'm stupid
12:24:02 <CometIIWW> But yeah it seems like they converge to ismilrar tomkpicts
12:24:04 <CometIIWW> Topics
12:24:29 <de67> tomkpicts
12:24:35 <de67> that a new esolang name
12:24:55 <CometIIWW> I got confused because chloropeth got moved to Miui's sandbox
12:26:55 <CometIIWW> Pgmpietoncracklang is implemented btw :3
12:27:46 <de67> cool
12:28:13 <CometIIWW> Wait a fucking second
12:28:19 <CometIIWW> Why the FUCK is the channel topic empty
12:29:01 <de67> whar
12:29:02 <de67> oh yea
12:29:13 <de67> its cuz of THE INCIDENT
12:29:17 <de67> yea
12:29:21 <de67> those were scary times
12:29:30 <de67> those were miserable times even
12:31:41 <de67> esomarker
12:31:41 <esomark> t 
 
12:31:44 <de67> hi PkmnQ
12:31:46 <de67> esomarker
12:31:46 <esomark> de67: just the hell not expected a style? de67> ^def car ,[.,] 
 
12:31:48 <de67> esomarker
12:31:48 <esomark> anyway 
 
12:31:50 <de67> esomarker
12:31:50 <esomark> defined. 
 
12:31:52 <de67> esomarker
12:31:52 <esomark> now it has joined 
 
12:32:16 <de67> brb ~20m
12:32:25 <PkmnQ> I'ts the weekenf!
12:32:27 <de67> gotta do some esomarker fixing
12:32:27 <esomark> its not in one of ('00', '01', '1', '0')..." 
 
12:32:43 <de67> "I'ts the weekenf!" ~ PkmnQ, 2026
12:35:22 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:22 <esomark> whar 
 
12:35:22 <esomarker> de67:  
12:35:24 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:24 <esomark> chimeraanova: ello. 
 
12:35:26 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:26 <esomark> ~show 
 
12:35:27 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:27 <esomark> ~clbuf 
 
12:35:28 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:28 <esomark> superstaranova: [[conditional bee]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=144743&oldid=94263 * bethat 
 
12:35:32 <CometIIWW> Rate limit
12:35:36 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:36 <esomark> oh 
 
12:35:38 <CometIIWW> esomarker
12:35:38 <esomark> ~cl nope 
 
12:39:02 <esomarker> de67:  
12:42:42 <esomarker> de67:  
12:45:05 <CometIIWW> I wonder how good LLMs are at making esolangs now
12:45:38 <CometIIWW> Like obviously back then they were shit at USING them (see Truttle1's video with o1 preview or whatever it was) but I wonder now
12:46:23 <esomarker> de67:  
12:47:26 <de67> CometIIWW: theyre still shit
12:48:01 <CometIIWW> I wonder what Claude Mythos thinks of programming in Befunge
12:48:27 <CometIIWW> Not fucking sure how these supposed "reasoning" models work but apparently you can tell an LLM to show its work
12:48:34 <CometIIWW> So it does that over and over again to get a result
12:48:59 <de67> CometIIWW: ill be back in 3 mins and ill explain how they work (to the best of my knowledge)
12:49:22 <CometIIWW> ok
12:50:04 <esomarker> de67:  
12:52:33 <de67> im bacc
12:52:35 <de67> so basically
12:52:57 <de67> you take a stupid llm that doesnt have "reasoning"
12:53:19 <de67> and you make it generate hidden reasoning token where it reasons out the token
12:53:21 <de67> for example
12:53:53 <de67> lets say an average chatgpt user asks chatgpt to solve a math problem: "whats 2*2+2?"
12:54:47 <de67> and chatgpt first generates hidden reasoning tokens: "ok, the user asked me to solve 2*2+2, first multiply: 2*2=4, then add: 4+2=6"
12:55:02 <de67> then generates the answer accordingly: "2*2+2=6"
12:55:17 <CometIIWW> Oh so it all comes back to LLMs, that's neat
12:55:55 <de67> ye
12:56:00 <CometIIWW> Tysm for raising my confidence level about this from 31.25124 to 73.21194012104718125781924718956508750353953285907486159865738925638256378544870218934673673894509487578754981287301675886758736092785156785295278578
12:57:03 <de67> thats a big number
12:57:30 <CometIIWW> There's a decimal point in there
12:57:48 <de67> oh
12:58:00 <de67> im sorry sim dumb
12:58:35 <CometIIWW> No need to apologize when I don't either for saying dumber stuff outside of #esolanging
14:08:18 <CometIIWW> esomark: How do I get std::simd to fucking work
14:08:18 <esomark> 
 
14:08:23 <CometIIWW> Great
14:08:25 <CometIIWW> Just great
14:41:07 <PkmnQ> i guess it's just impossible
14:41:51 <CometIIWW> PkmnQ: Wait until C++41 then std::simd will work on GCC and Clang
14:42:19 <CometIIWW> Then C++29 will be fully supported in C++62
14:42:38 <CometIIWW> To be fair, C++26 is quite recent and it's still 2026
14:42:50 <CometIIWW> Unlike C++17 which has had around 9 years to sink in
14:42:57 <CometIIWW> Even C++20 has had 6 years
14:57:39 <de67> hi guys
14:57:40 <de67> im bacc
14:57:58 <de67> sorry for being inactive announced
15:02:06 <de67> unannounced*
15:03:17 <de67> damn
15:45:54 <PkmnQ> just thought about https://esolangs.org/wiki/User:Gilbert189/Iternary again
15:46:58 <PkmnQ> the reason why this time is because of a recent post of his elsewhere: "Ah, iterators. The unsung hero of Python programming. Something that is only used in practice to iterate through collections. You might have heard some of the built-in functions that make/are them: range, enumerate, zip, map, filter, probably more. But what if I tell you, iterators can do so much more than counting for a for loop? What if I tell you iterators can do anything you can 
15:46:58 <PkmnQ> think of? In this... course I've decided to make, I will show you how you can (ab)use iterators to their very limit, and show that you can really use Python solely by calling functions."
16:09:23 <PkmnQ> esomark: what are your thoughts on iterators
16:09:24 <esomark> de67 | things our decentralized underground insurgency 
 
16:09:34 <PkmnQ> sure whatever
17:17:17 <PkmnQ> ykw i might try my own iterator-based thingy
17:17:50 <PkmnQ> i'll call it "laminar" just because i feel like it
17:20:44 <Assembly> hi de67
17:20:52 <de67> hi Assembly
17:20:54 <de67> btw
17:20:58 <Assembly> ?
17:21:17 <de67> i think that youll be better off by forking the python version of esomark
17:21:17 <esomark> [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] 
 
17:21:27 <Assembly> why?
17:21:27 <de67> since its easier to use and hack
17:21:37 <Assembly> i didn't even need to make the bot anyway
17:21:38 <Assembly> lol
17:21:44 <de67> ok
17:21:53 <Assembly> im not interested anymore lol
17:31:33 <Assembly> im interested in 🏳️‍⚧️🦞
17:31:39 <Assembly> i might make some commands for it
17:36:08 <de67> tysm!!
17:51:31 <Assembly> https://codeberg.org/vblackmar/lobstrans-assembly/src/branch/master/interpreter.py does this work in your python interpreter? if not, tell me
17:52:12 <Assembly> de67
17:54:22 <de67> you should read CONTRIBUTING.md since all the rules are there
17:55:06 <de67> basically, you need to make sure that 🙂 and 龍 do 7 things at the same time, and also add them to SPEC.md
17:55:16 <Assembly> aw man
17:55:20 <de67> after that its all good
18:04:43 <Assembly> de67 check https://codeberg.org/vblackmar/lobstrans-assembly/src/branch/master/interpreter.py again
18:05:48 <de67> looks good to me
18:06:32 <de67> but 7 and \ should use different symbols (si ce they violate rule 2)
18:06:41 <de67> which is very easy to fix
18:11:11 <de67> ok i see you fixed it now
18:11:22 <de67> feel free to open a pull request and ill merge the changes
18:12:04 <Assembly> i noticed that 1 violated the rule too so I changed that one too
18:13:32 <de67> btw, you should edit SPEC.md now
18:13:52 <Assembly> ye im doing that
18:15:27 <Assembly> https://codeberg.org/vblackmar/lobstrans-assembly/src/branch/master/SPEC.md i did it
18:15:58 <de67> cool
18:16:06 <de67> now open a pull request
18:16:33 <Assembly> https://codeberg.org/de67/lobstrans/pulls/1
18:19:50 <de67> yay!!!
18:21:14 <Assembly> ok also edit the esolanging page? (or do i do it)
18:22:24 <de67> i can do that
18:22:28 <de67> but i need to sleep now
18:22:38 <de67> so its gonna be postponed tomorrow
18:22:38 <Assembly> ok ig
18:22:44 <de67> anyway
18:22:45 <de67> gn