02:31:16 hi 04:01:04 hi:) 04:03:27 hau 04:03:29 hai 05:24:10 lmao 05:53:25 guys 05:53:27 gays 05:53:35 luk: 05:53:36 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Elementary_cellular_automaton_67.svg 05:53:58 brb ~67 centuries 07:53:16 hey de67_ I sent my response! 07:53:23 ok 07:53:27 lemme see 07:53:30 thanku 07:53:44 oh ye 07:53:48 btw sorry if it bothers you that I notify you about it every time 07:53:57 ive read it earlier today 07:54:03 yayimheretoo: dw 07:54:08 de67_ nice! 07:54:12 and cool:) 07:54:16 this is very fun 07:54:27 these questions are unexpected 07:54:34 would you say you have a direction going? 07:54:48 yayimheretoo: not really 07:55:00 de67_ cool. 07:55:20 its literally going 1 question per day lmao. I take so long 07:55:24 it makes sense 07:55:34 yayimheretoo: me too 07:55:46 de67_ wut 07:55:46 it takes me a while to come up with a question 07:55:50 ah ok 07:55:51 lol 07:56:11 damn 07:56:18 its long since I last published an esolang 07:56:26 yayimheretoo: not really 07:56:32 NNice isnrelatively recent 07:56:49 de67_: NNice doesn't count in my mind because I already made it once 07:56:57 yayimheretoo: N-Type? 07:56:59 Bitch, Ienai! is based off of one of my own langs 07:57:02 de67_ ye 07:57:18 NNice = N-Type 07:57:20 how weird 07:57:28 they both start with a capital N 07:57:33 idfk what thats about 07:57:36 id say 07:57:43 N-Type ≈ NNice 07:57:45 hm 07:57:48 ye 07:57:49 ≈ is a cool sign 07:57:54 i like it 07:57:54 yea its nice 07:58:02 ≈≈≈≈ its on my keyboard 07:58:04 may make an edolang about it 07:58:14 option + shift + 0 07:58:14 yayimheretoo: same could be said about NNice's name :-) 07:58:15 ≈ 07:58:23 de67_ lmao 07:58:49 i wanna do like a Miui style esolang. they just bring together a riddicolus amount of concepts 07:59:07 in nonsense ways sure 07:59:10 yayimheretoo: lemme throw in sum stuff 07:59:16 but still 07:59:25 de67_ to the Miui style esolang? 07:59:26 sure 07:59:33 but it gotta make sense 07:59:42 actually im prolly gonna rant it through in cat 07:59:44 *cat 07:59:46 *chat 07:59:47 jeez 08:00:13 i wanna base it off of serious, kinda 08:00:16 https://esolangs.org/wiki/Serious 08:01:03 serious is a pretty simply function, say & is a stream of inputs 08:01:03 then its like 08:01:53 def f & : bool(&) -> pop(&) | ~bool(&) -> pass 08:01:59 thats a weird syntax 08:02:03 but o well 08:02:20 well no 08:02:24 its 08:02:27 tag systems, audio & graphical output, thematic pseudonatural commands, no input, love no fun only horror of the indiffrently passing time and slow deterioration of your body, your mind and everything as the fog and disease consumes everything you knew and at the end there will be nothing left other than eternal emptiness 08:02:29 f & : bool(&) -> f pop(&) | ~bool(&) -> pass 08:02:42 de67_ oh? 08:02:56 yayimheretoo: ye! 08:03:09 just a few fun concepts for an esolang! 08:04:27 i remember the edologs being a bit different 08:04:31 esologs 08:06:40 f & : g & -> f pop(&) | g^-1 & -> f null 08:06:46 ok thats what I have rn 08:06:59 thinking of combining it with Windows找不到文件“啊”。- Windows找不到文件“啊”。 08:07:56 yayimheretoo: what a name! 08:08:20 in fact! 08:08:23 idfk what it means 08:08:32 yayimheretoo: it could be something racist! 08:08:46 de67_ is prysignetofry racist? 08:08:51 yayimheretoo: idk 08:08:56 i doubt that 08:08:56 de67_ lol 08:09:20 its a derivative of their language https://esolangs.org/wiki/Windows找不到文件“啊”%E3%80%82请确认文件名正确后再试一次%E3%80%82 08:09:31 just make sure that if you use a name thats in a language you cant speak, maybe you should run it through a translator to see if its racist or not 08:10:08 lol 08:10:47 The file "ah" could not be found. Please check that the file name is correct and try again. 08:10:54 is that racist! 08:13:17 anyways 08:13:21 yayimheretoo: who knows 08:13:27 de67_ lol 08:13:34 Windows找不到文件“啊”。- Windows找不到文件“啊” is also a very simple function 08:14:38 r i = g i.replace(g,null) 08:15:08 ok so we have 08:15:23 f & : g & -> f pop(&) | g^-1 & -> f null 08:15:23 r i : g i.replace(g,null) 08:15:48 im just using g to indicate some secondary function 08:17:50 lemme look at the esolang 08:18:00 cool 08:22:19 I wonder if you could place these things inside like 08:22:25 the structure of a constraint lamguage 08:23:08 lemme rambke about a constraint language idea i had 08:23:14 ooooo 08:23:17 i shall 08:23:43 for every program p, there is program p^-1, which has inverse effect (i.e. the language is reversible) 08:23:53 yes ok 08:24:23 if p is a program and q is a program, pq is a program that has combined effect (i.e. the language is concatenative) 08:24:38 no program ever halts 08:24:57 this seems very 08:25:11 https://esolangs.org/wiki/Burro 08:25:19 every instruction gets executed at least once 08:25:34 ooo 08:25:36 i likey 08:27:26 hm 08:27:36 i feel like there can be more constraints 08:27:46 there doesn't need to be 08:27:48 but ye 08:27:52 the the constraint space itself is constrained due to prior constraints 08:28:02 yea 08:28:04 always is 08:28:08 practically 08:28:11 ok may I ramble 08:28:18 to see if I can find a constraint to add? 08:28:20 yayimheretoo: sure 08:28:28 de67_: thanku 08:28:30 so 08:29:51 say you have p and q, and (p+q)^-1, there exist a program f, which when appended to (p+q)^-1, turns the program into q. f ≠ p nor q, nor either of those with content appendedf 08:30:01 i *think* this is non contradictory 08:30:10 also 08:30:14 i have to ask 08:30:46 oo 08:30:47 ok 08:30:52 (p+q^-1)^-1 = (p^-1+q)^-1 = (p+q)^-1 08:30:54 is that true 08:30:57 js curious 08:31:02 wait no 08:31:07 gimme a sec 08:31:46 also 08:31:51 (p^-1+q) = (p+q)^-1 08:32:00 ais523 needs to ban 2 ppl 08:32:08 oh? 08:32:10 User:Guessthesongco and User:Dlenow 08:32:17 dam 08:32:26 both were created with the sole purpose of advertising vibecoded games 08:32:42 dam 08:33:17 yayimheretoo: the dam failed and resulted in a catastrophic flood 08:33:25 de67_ noooooo 08:33:27 lmao 08:33:36 but de67_ (p^-1+q) = (p+q)^-1 ? 08:33:40 is that true or false? 08:33:45 wait no 08:33:50 i made a mistake again im sorry 08:33:53 gimme a sec 08:34:07 (q^-1+p) = (p+q)^-1 08:34:11 is THAT true? 08:34:46 lemme see 08:35:32 no 08:35:43 aalso the rule I proposed has a contradiction I think so ill have to change it to (p+q+f)^-1+f = q 08:35:46 de67_ kewl 08:36:07 that also seems contradictory 08:36:54 thye original is contradictory bcuz: 08:36:54 (p+p^-1)^-1 = NOP 08:36:55 so 08:36:55 NOP + f = p^-1 08:36:58 which dont make sense 08:37:23 in (p+q+f)^-1+f = q thhats fine tho 08:37:28 bbcuz then its 08:37:42 (p+p^-1+f)^-1+f = p^-1 08:37:47 which is much more realisti 08:38:02 then its (NOP+f)^-1+f = p^-1 08:39:28 which like 08:39:41 WAIT 08:39:43 DAMMIT 08:39:44 A 08:39:45 A 08:39:46 A 08:39:47 A 08:40:13 ok wait is (p+q+f+...)^-1 = p^-1+q^-1+f^-1+... 08:40:22 because then its fine I think maybe 08:41:24 hopefully 08:42:43 oh fuck me! 08:43:03 it doesn't 08:43:17 hmmmmmmmmm 08:43:33 these are some restrictive rules im tellin' ya but ill work it out 08:49:34 ok de67_ I think the next step to introduce more rules it define more operators. currently the only things you can do is append and negate programs 08:49:41 which makes it hard to define new things 08:50:24 yayimheretoo: how about 08:50:28 subtract 08:50:53 subtraction is appending a negated program to a program 08:51:06 so p-q = p+(q^-1)? 08:51:11 yayimheretoo: yes 08:51:17 ok i likey 08:51:37 also the notation for negation will be -p instead of p^-1 08:51:44 nice 08:51:46 so that it makes sense 08:51:58 how about 08:52:02 multiplication 08:52:05 ok maybe this Is a lil crazy BUT 08:52:48 what if F(p) = q, where q*q = p 08:53:43 de67_ sounds good? 08:53:48 or well 08:53:51 q*f whatever f is 08:54:03 we need to define multiplication 08:54:12 ofc 08:54:19 p+q=p+p+p+... 08:54:20 you can go backwards from that 08:54:24 but how would that work 08:54:26 hm 08:54:57 oh wait, how about we append to p to p until the result + q = 0 08:55:07 nvm 08:55:22 mmaybe until +(q^-1) = 0 08:56:08 wait no 08:56:17 thhen it would just be trying to reach q lol 08:59:24 ok idea. what if Ω(p) is the program which encodes p 08:59:27 now lemme explain 08:59:48 that means if you look at the things Ω(p) does, like x -> y state transitions, that encodes p 09:00:06 ten p*q could equal p+p+... = Ω(q) 09:00:10 or smth 09:00:31 de67_ see above 09:00:48 then -Ω(p) = Ω(-p) 09:04:26 ignore the multiplication thing tho 09:04:32 that dont work 09:04:41 but Ω is interesting I think 09:06:44 ok 09:08:43 p*q could be like p*q = x where Ω(x)+p = q 09:09:49 hm 09:09:56 thats my suggestions 09:09:57 Ω and * 09:09:59 oh 09:10:31 isnt Ω(x) just ∆x? 09:10:51 what is ∆x? 09:14:06 change in state 09:14:29 i mean 09:15:02 Ω(x) would encode x as changes in state. So like, Ω(x) is a program, and when you look at all the state changes it does, those state changes are an encoding of the symbols of x 09:22:25 so de67: summarized, Ω(x) is a program, in which you can convert ∆Ω(x) into x 09:25:42 ok 09:50:42 the nirvana that we were promised ended up not aariving 09:55:07 de67_ oh? 10:30:33 hai guys 10:30:38 im bbacc 10:31:02 hi KaleidoscopeFive 10:46:48 hiya is there anything interesting ongoing 10:47:19 because i have 1.5 hours of nothing before i can go home 10:47:42 esomark: seen anything lately 10:47:42 sure 10:50:31 yeah I'll just be checking the logs periodically to see if anything happens bye 11:04:20 im alive 11:11:21 hi PkmnQ 11:11:21 holy crap signs of life detected 11:11:35 im thinking of a really obsufca[97;1:3uted esolang 11:11:51 alrighty 11:11:54 an unprintable character in my message is fitting :3 11:12:26 idk what i can actually do esolanging-wise since i'm kind of just on some random seat with pretty much only my phone for the next hour or so 11:12:49 PkmnQ: make a draft for a new sloplang 11:13:03 also holy moly you do a lot of drivinf 11:13:07 why not an old sloplang 11:13:29 sure 11:13:53 "There has been a failed attempt to log in to your account from a new device. Please make sure your account has a strong password." ~ MediaWiki, 2026 11:14:24 i enjoy having a password so complicated that i struggle to type it sometimes 11:14:39 my password is 1234 if anybodys curious 11:15:34 damn 11:36:11 hello 11:36:48 hey somefan any progress? 11:37:24 hi yayimheretoo 11:37:33 hi de67:) 11:40:16 i just wrote my largest talk page comment so far 11:42:25 dam 11:42:27 lemme see 12:23:20 holy 12:23:21 holy... 12:23:44 nearly a thousand lce vulns found in lunix... 12:23:57 s/pce/lpe/ 12:25:10 s/lce/lpe/ 13:25:02 hi PkmnQ 13:25:16 hi PkmnQ! 13:26:33 anyway 13:26:41 i realized that i ran out of esolang name ideas 13:26:54 so im gonna steal names :3 13:27:13 nooooo 13:27:17 ESOMARK 13:27:21 esomark 13:27:21 13:27:22 ??? 13:27:24 dammit 13:27:26 i forgor 13:27:28 esomark 13:27:28 13:27:30 esomark 13:27:30 ^reverse antidisestablishmentarianism 13:27:36 de67: https://esolangs.org/wiki/Brainfuck_(Dragoneater67) when 13:27:38 reverse antidisestablishmentarianism boom name 13:28:00 esomark 13:28:00 esomark 13:28:08 esomark thats a name 13:28:08 13:28:12 esomark 13:28:12 also, what 13:28:22 also, what boom 'mother name 13:28:24 *nother 13:39:37 ok 13:41:57 lol 13:57:09 apparently my group's CS project for the semester has 67 tests and they have all passed 13:57:53 nice...? 14:09:12 wow 14:09:43 anyway 14:09:48 next esolang coming soom 14:09:49 also 14:09:51 yay 14:10:08 i rediscovered some russian analog series that inspired my hum0r 14:10:16 wow 14:11:00 its the reason i joke about the disease that consumes all and the void left behind and the insanity of s4meis thibgnbag thart wtwmrw r wnrwrver thrner egevbefpeorir 14:11:13 lol 14:12:17 the series themselves are among the bleakest plot-wise 14:12:40 in a good or bad way 14:13:02 in a good way 14:14:01 nice! 14:14:53 but basically, the central point is some disease that makes people go mad and eventually die, it spreads through air and water, there was also a famine in the 90s due to blockade by the government, and there are insane scientists making unethical experiments and some eldritch creatures too 14:15:11 nice 14:16:17 the next esolang will lay groundwork for subsequent works 14:21:31 oh thats epic 14:21:32 !! 14:30:34 damn you irc 14:31:20 oh yeah i was supposed to make a draft for an old sloplang 14:31:24 almost forgot 14:32:36 llol 14:34:38 https://esolangs.org/wiki/%CE%99%CE%A7%CE%98%CE%A5%CE%A3_PRIME#How_accumulator_works <- i know the fish probably means something but there's just something about "the fish looks like this" 14:38:16 PkmnQ: it means something but none lf us will understands cuz its fuckin' miui 14:38:19 I like their esolangs 14:38:21 but god 14:38:25 thhey are incomprehensible 14:45:27 what if... 14:45:34 there is NO meaning to understand? 14:45:57 there is the concept of "an art peice which resembles a wikipage" which it might be 14:46:03 also i beg for todays log 14:46:15 https://esolanging.wiki/logs 14:46:30 https://esolanging.wiki/logs/2026-10-10.txt to be more specific 14:46:32 for sum reason its always out of order on my end idk why 14:46:35 de67: thanku 14:47:12 isn't it https://esolanging.wiki/logs/2026-11-10.txt 14:47:37 its the tenth of November but I dont remember which month November is 14:48:06 your correct! 14:48:08 oh ye 14:48:26 ok, my next esolang may end up turning into a horrorlang 14:48:33 we keep inventing new genres! 14:48:40 lol 14:48:49 also why the fuck ddoes logs turn ≈ into â‰ˆ 14:48:54 how 14:48:55 why 14:48:56 wut 14:48:57 yayimiheretoo: mojibake :) 14:48:59 becuas eebeuc abeubacueu 14:49:12 lol 14:49:33 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Mojibakevector.png?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=original 14:49:35 soo whhat I had for my esolang was 14:49:45 f & : g & -> f pop(&) | g^-1 & -> f null 14:49:45 r i : g i.replace(g,null) 15:04:37 hmmm 15:04:44 now how can I plug this into a constraint language 15:06:06 im stealing your constraint language for this de67 15:06:10 its happening 15:07:15 p+q = p -> q 15:07:16 p+-q = 0 15:07:17 ok 15:07:19 hmm 15:07:20 ANDD 15:08:09 Ω(p) = map(x->y, p) 15:09:02 Ω(-p)+p = Ω(p+p) 15:11:16 now lets treat all these(the constraints, and functions, as objects) 15:11:29 i gtg but this is what I have for now 15:35:01 bacc :3 15:37:20 i hav a rlly 15:37:22 fun idea 15:37:27 what if mojibake 15:37:31 but esolang??? 16:13:11 de67: helll ye 16:13:14 also im back:) 16:20:13 de67: yeah i'm kind of surprised that isn't a thing i've heard of yet 16:21:12 im surprised in general there isn't a generalized formula to tun a function into a programming language 16:30:47 yayimheretoo: i mean the first question would be what even is a programming language 16:31:10 because by my definition you don't need a formula because the function already is one (it might be a very stupid programming language that doesn't do anything useful but a programming language nonetheless) 16:31:10 PkmnQ: category theory probably has a definition 16:33:55 i mean I guess so 16:33:59 but that's boring 16:35:31 sorry what did I miss 16:35:34 stupid internet 16:37:13 * yayimheretoo has quit (Quit: Client closed) 16:37:13 * yayimheretoo (~yayimhere@197.184.100.194) has joined 16:37:23